|
cutlass777
|
(Posted 3/11/2007 9:57:00 PM) Listen to him stutter, him and haw as more recent info is presented to him about being an escort. He also claims his last movie was 15 years ago. It was actually in 1999.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYWPgHccJNM
This guy named "willy" is having a ball with him on Matt's own blog.
Willy said...
Sanchez says he was never gay. He sucked dick and fucked guys only for the money. The interview with the porn studio where he named two "actors" who he'd like to get it on with -- that's ignored. His whoring? Just for the money, Mateo?
The Manhunt profile? Mateo doesn't deny having one. He only says it's possible for someone to fake a profile using his pics. And, in a different thread on this website, a guy (elmysterio), says that he knew Sanchez back in California and that Sanchez went to gay bathhouses. But he wasn't gay.
Sanchez calls himself Cpl. Sanchez, a reservist. Technically accurate, but fails to mention that his reserve status is inactive. And it looks like he was never on active duty other than when he went to boot camp and military schools shortly thereafter. In other words, in a time of war Sanchez joined the Marine Corps as a reservist, which allowed him to get that spiffy uniform and some training for his next porn career.
And there's Columbia University. He poses as a Columbia student. Technically accurate, but he fails to mention that he's attending their extension school, which has minimal admissions standards and cannot be compared to what is commonly understood to be an Ivy League school.
Matt Sanchez is a fuckin' phony. He is a classic man-whore: All pose and illusion. He's fooled the right wingers, but he's not fooling any marines and he's not fooling any gay people. Well, not too many gay people, anyway. And I dare say that his wingnut poster-boy days have about one more week to go, if that.
March 11, 2007 2:25 PM
|
|
sloppy43
|
(Posted 3/12/2007 1:05:00 AM) Buddyboy and Cutlass,
The School of General Studies at Columbia is NOT the extension school, and the admission standards are NOT minimal.
The School of General Studies is one of four degree-granting undergraduate colleges at Columbia. A degree from the GS school, which Matt Sanchez is enrolled under, is exactly the same as a degree from the Fu Foundation School of Engineering; Columbia College; or Barnard College. The difference is an administrative one, because each school caters to students with different needs. Columbia College, for example, is reserved for students who enroll immediately after high school and do not take time off before enrolling. Barnard is for women only; and the General Studies school is for people who have taken a year or more off between high school and the start of their university studies.
To drive the point home, there IS in fact a continuing education program at Columbia that does not have degree-granting authority. Matt is NOT enrolled under that program.
For more info on the differences: http://www.studentaffairs.columbia.edu/admissions/faq/admissions.php#36
>>>>>>>>>>
Buddyboy wrote:
There are a few inaccuracies in his salon.com piece that should be mentioned:
*Sanchez/Majors keeps referring to himself as "an Ivy Leaguer," but he is not an actual undergraduate at Columbia College--he is at the Columbia University School of General Studies, which is basically the Columbia extension school.
This post was edited 3/12/2007 1:07:32 AM by sloppy43.
|
|
PChuck
|
(Posted 3/12/2007 2:56:00 AM) ^...and Matt..., I mean sloppy43, comes in and sets the record "straight".
By the way, I loved you in Built Tough. You should send Ann a copy.
|
|
cutlass777
|
(Posted 3/12/2007 10:03:00 AM) LOL
|
|
sloppy43
|
(Posted 3/12/2007 6:37:00 PM) Actually if Matt were to come post here, I would expect him to post comments under his actual name, since he's been more than happy to do that on the other blogs like Joe.My.God.
My partner is a student in GS at Columbia, which is why I wrote in. He does have an American Studies class with Matt, coincidentally (they are both American Studies majors.)
I wrote in because I wanted to correct the misperception that a GS degree is somehow less valuable than a Columbia College degree. They cost the same (over $40,000 a year) and the students all attend the same classes together. The only difference is in age.
|
|
esckey
|
(Posted 3/12/2007 7:02:00 PM) Did anyone hear the Signorile interview on OutQ?
I thought Signorile did a horrible job. He constantly interrupted. He said it was because Matt wasn't answering the questions, but Sanchez wasn't allowed to complete a sentence, so how could he know Matt wasn't answering the questions?
Two things bothered me about what Sanchez was allowed to say as it relates to his past:
First, he said he did the films from 92-93. He said it was a summer job. He also said he was not gay at the time. That he could only do it by mentally focusing. So it lasted for TWO summers. Why did he go back?
Second, he said he came to his conservative beliefs after porn when he lived in Germany, Spain and Canada. How was that financed? This post was edited 3/12/2007 7:04:00 PM by esckey.
|
|
Buddyboy
|
(Posted 3/12/2007 8:08:00 PM) sloppy43 IS correct that the School of General Studies is NOT the "extension school" for Columbia, and I will revise my comments to rectify that error. (And I apologize for the error, too.) It is true, too, that the GS students attend the same classes as the undergraduates at Columbia College, and that they cost the same.
However, it is just not true that "the only difference is in age," or that a degree from the GS school is viewed in quite the same way as a degree from Columbia College. The admissions standards for the college and for the School for the GS are quite different, and it is much harder to get into Columbia College than it is to get into the School for GS. Moreover, I know and have known quite a number of professors and graduate students at Columbia, and from what they have said to me they do not tend to view the GS students as generally up to the same academic level as the College's undergraduates. This post was edited 3/12/2007 8:16:11 PM by Buddyboy.
|
|
rym
|
(Posted 3/13/2007 2:40:00 AM) All of that being said, Sanchez speaks well, uses good grammar, and talks coherently, which I suspect could not be said about all ex-porn stars. It's just sad that he's using his 'smarts' such as they are, to support such a bad agenda - not only an illegal war, but also a sex-negative, and especially a gay-sex negative political agenda. Sadly, the military has wedded itself to the Republican party to a large extent, and almost everyone who joins the military is indoctrinated into a very politically conservative point of view. I have heard people on Fox say, "We are the only news network the soldiers in Iraq request". Uh...
You are the only network the military upper brass ALLOWS.......
I don't forgive or exonerate Sanchez for his inconsistent or poorly thought-out political positions, but I do feel he has absorbed a lot of this through his time in military training.
|
|
Duggers
|
(Posted 3/13/2007 1:58:00 PM) I thought Signorile did as well as could be expected with the guy. Sanchez is just plain nuts. You can't logically be a male hooker for years, fuck probably dozens (or hundreds) of men for years, make a large amount of gay porn, then claim you were straight all along and think anyone will believe you. That's probably the way a shithouse rat thinks.
He can't possibly believe that he's going to be a marine for long when by some coincidence (?) on the same day the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (MARINE General Pace) states he considers homosexuality to be immoral and the military should not condone it by allowing gay personnel to serve openly.
Frankly, he indicates he feels the same way as the General, so he shouldn't have any qualms when they strip him of of his status.
I don't like seeing anyone suffer, and this guy clearly is on many levels, but he's got absolutely no one to blame but himself (not Joe_My_God, not ) the gayhs) for a long list of strange choices. He seems to not be able to recognize that some things you undertake may prevent you from undertaking certain things in your future.
Has anyone heard of Coulter, O'Reilly or Hannity offering up even a single word yet?
I've not.
This post was edited 3/13/2007 6:45:24 PM by Duggers.
|
|
dalibor
|
(Posted 3/16/2007 10:22:00 PM) In fact, Alan Colmes did an interesting interview with Sanchez this week, which I accessed from the gaypornblog.com site. He pretty much traps Sanchez about the dates of his films and escorting. (Both much more recent than he claims.)
By the way, I don't think Sanchez is anti-gay, but he does claim not to be gay. However hard that is to believe, it does not make him anti-gay, and I think he has said as much.
Whatever he says now, there seems to be plenty of evidence that he WAS gay, even if he claims to have switched sides.
|
|